Link to
spacer Download pdf spacer Print page spacer Contact us spacer return to
 Home >> Corporate governance

Corporate governance

BT’s policy is to achieve best practice in our standards of business integrity for all our operations. This includes a commitment to maintaining the highest standards of corporate governance throughout the group.

During the year there have been recommendations on UK corporate governance by Derek Higgs and Sir Robert Smith, and hence proposed changes to the UK’s Combined Code on Corporate Governance. This section of the annual report describes how BT has applied the Code and where it stands on some of the key proposed changes resulting from the above recommendations. The directors consider that BT has, throughout the year, complied with the provisions of the current Code.

The Board
The Board meets every month, except in August. Additionally, it meets on an ad hoc basis to consider matters which are time critical. The Board met 14 times during the 2003 financial year.

The Board’s principal focus is the overall strategic direction, development and control of the group. In support of this focus the Board approves the group’s strategic plans, annual budget, capital expenditure and investments budgets, larger capital expenditure proposals and the group’s overall system of internal controls, governance and compliance authorities and it has oversight and control of the group’s operating and financial performance. These responsibilities are set out in a formal statement of the Board’s role which, together with the powers of the Operating Committee and Management Council and the authorities delegated to individual members of the Operating Committee, are made available to everyone in the group on the group’s intranet site.

The Board, which operates as a single team, is currently made up of the part-time Chairman, five executive directors and seven independent non-executive directors. It is BT’s policy that the board will comprise a majority of independent non-executive directors. The desired combination of experience, skills and other attributes that the non-executive directors as a whole are to bring to the Board is agreed and regularly reviewed by the Nominating Committee. This profile is used by the Committee to assess the suitability as non-executive directors of candidates put forward by the directors and outside consultants before the Committee meets short-listed candidates. Between them, the current non-executive directors bring experience and independent judgement, gained at the most senior levels, of international business operations and strategy, marketing, technology, communications and political and international affairs.

The non-executive directors provide a strong independent element on the Board. Sir Anthony Greener, the Deputy Chairman, is the senior independent director. In his capacity as the chairman of the Remuneration Committee, he meets with BT’s major institutional shareholders. The Deputy Chairman will also continue to be available to discuss matters with institutional shareholders where it would be inappropriate for those discussions to take place with either the Chairman or the Chief Executive. He will also attend, at his discretion and in consultation with the Chairman and the Chief Executive, other meetings with shareholders during the year. The Chairman and the non-executive directors hold regular dinners at which they discuss matters without the presence of the executive directors.

Sir Anthony Greener chairs the Audit and Remuneration Committees. He is also a member of the Nominating Committee. Maarten van den Bergh sits on all three committees. Both directors bring great breadth of relevant experience to these committees, whose total memberships are six, five and four directors, respectively.

Non-executive directors are appointed initially for three years. At the end of that period the appointment may be continued by mutual agreement, subject normally to three months’ termination notice from either BT or the director. The longest serving non-executive director has been in office for nearly three and a half years.

All directors are required by the company’s articles of association to be elected by shareholders at the first AGM after their appointment, if appointed by the Board. A director must subsequently retire by rotation at an AGM if he or she was elected or last re-elected at or before the AGM in the third year before the year in question. The director may seek re-election.

The Chairman and executive directors have service agreements, which are approved by the Remuneration Committee. Information about the periods of these contracts is in the Report on directors’ remuneration.

The Board has a procedure for directors, in furtherance of their duties, to take independent professional advice if necessary, at the company’s expense. In addition, all directors have access to the advice and services of the Secretary, the appointment and removal of whom is a matter for the whole Board. He advises the Board on appropriate procedures for the management of its meetings and duties (and the meetings of the company’s principal committees), as well as the implementation of corporate governance and compliance within the group.

On appointment, the directors take part in an induction programme when they receive information about BT, the role of the Board and the matters reserved for its decision, the terms of reference and membership of the principal Board and management committees, and the powers delegated to those committees, the company’s corporate governance practices and procedures, including the powers reserved to the group’s most senior executives, and the latest financial information about the group. This is supplemented by visits to key BT locations and meetings with members of the Operating Committee and other key senior executives. Throughout their period in office the directors are continually updated on BT’s business, the competitive and regulatory environments in which it operates, corporate social responsibility matters and other changes affecting BT and the communications industry as a whole, by written briefings and meetings with senior BT executives. Directors are also advised on appointment of their legal and other duties and obligations as a director of a listed company, both in writing and in face-to-face meetings with the Secretary. They are reminded of these duties each year and they are also updated on changes to the legal and governance requirements of the company and upon themselves as directors. During the 2003 financial year, for example, they have received briefings on the recommended changes to UK corporate governance put forward by Derek Higgs and Sir Robert Smith, the Enterprise Act and the provisions of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that affect BT because its shares are registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Guidelines are in place concerning the content, presentation and delivery of papers for each Board meeting, so that the directors have enough information to be properly briefed.

The Board has agreed that it will carry out an evaluation of its performance. This will be carried out by questionnaire and, where appropriate, individual interviews during summer 2003, with a subsequent review at a board meeting.

Principal Board committee
The Chief Executive, Ben Verwaayen, chairs the Operating Committee, which meets weekly. The other members are the Group Finance Director, the Chief Executives of BT Retail, BT Wholesale and BT Global Services and the Chief Broadband Officer. The Secretary attends all meetings. The Committee has collective responsibility for running the group’s business end-to-end. To do that, it develops the group’s strategy and budget for Board approval, recommends to the Board the group’s capital expenditure and investments budgets, monitors the financial, operational and customer quality of service performance of the whole group, allocates resources across the group within plans agreed by the Board, plans and delivers major cross-business programmes and reviews the senior talent base and succession plans of the group.

A sub-committee of the Operating Committee, the Management Council, meets monthly. It consists of the Operating Committee members plus a number of other senior executives. It is an advisory forum supporting the Chief Executive and the Operating Committee in policy formulation, in areas such as public policy, reputation and business practices policies, human resources and employment policies. Through a specific sub-committee of its own the Management Council monitors the performance of the BT Pension Scheme, draws material matters on pensions policy to the Board’s attention, reviews public policy, regulatory and Government activities in the pensions area and oversees internal and external communications on pensions matters.

The Nominating Committee, consisting of the Chairman, the Deputy Chairman and two other non-executive directors, ensures an appropriate balance of experience and abilities on the Board, using this evaluation to review annually the size and composition of the Board and to recommend any proposed changes to the Board. It keeps under review the need for appointments to the Board, prepares a description of the specific experience and skills needed for an appointment, considers candidates who are put forward by the directors and external consultants, and recommends to the Board the appointments of all directors after having met short-listed candidates. It also reviews the time required from the Deputy Chairman and other non-executive directors to carry out their duties and advises the Board on succession planning for the positions of the Chairman, Deputy Chairman, Chief Executive and all other Board appointments. In the Board’s opinion, it is appropriate for the Chairman to chair the Nominating Committee in its task of reviewing and agreeing the structure of the board and considering candidates as directors, both executive and non-executive. The Committee met once during the 2003 financial year.

The Audit Committee, comprising solely independent non-executive directors, is chaired by Sir Anthony Greener. The members of the Committee all bring relevant experience from senior executive levels. The Committee recommends the appointment and reappointment of the company’s auditors, ensuring that key partners are rotated at appropriate intervals, and considers the resignation or dismissal of the auditors, recommending to the Board appropriate action to appoint new auditors. It reviews the auditors’ performance, including the scope of the audit, and recommends to the Board appropriate remuneration. The Committee monitors the extent of non-audit work to be performed by the company’s auditors to ensure that the provision of non-audit services does not impair their independence or objectivity. It discusses with the auditors the scope of their audits before they commence, reviews the results and considers the auditors’ Management Letter and reports the results of those reviews to the Board. The Audit Committee reviews the company’s published financial results, the Annual Report and Form 20-F and other published information for statutory and regulatory compliance. It also reviews the disclosure made by the Chief Executive and Group Finance Director during the certification process for the annual report about the design or operation of internal controls or material weaknesses in the controls, including any fraud involving management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s financial controls. The Board, as required by UK law, takes responsibility for all disclosures in the annual report. The Audit Committee monitors and reviews the standards of risk management and internal control, the effectiveness of internal control, financial reporting, accounting policies and procedures, and the company’s statements on internal controls before they are agreed by the Board for each year’s annual report. It also reviews the company’s internal audit function and its relationship with the external auditors, including internal audit’s plans and performance. The Group Finance Director and the Secretary attend its meetings. Each year, the Committee sets aside time to seek the views of the company’s internal and external auditors in the absence of executives. The Committee met four times during the 2003 financial year. At its meetings the Committee has reviewed the company’s full year and quarterly results and its Annual Report and Form 20-F and considered the adequacy of the financial systems that have produced those results. It has reported its views to the Board so it has been able to approve the results announcements and the annual report for publication. It has also during the 2003 financial year considered the group’s risk register as submitted to it by the Management Council and reviewed the company’s internal control, accounting systems and related matters.

The Committee has agreed, for the 2004 financial year, in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to:

  • establish a process for dealing with complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
  • oversee the adoption of a specific code of ethics for the Chief Executive, Group Finance Director and Director Group Financial Control, which is consistent with BT’s overall statement of business ethics (see ‘‘Statement of business practice’’).

The Remuneration Committee comprises solely independent non-executive directors and is chaired by Sir Anthony Greener. It met seven times during the 2003 financial year. Further details about the Committee are included in the Report on directors’ remuneration.

Committee memberships are shown in Board of directors and Operating Committee.

Internal control and risk management
The Board is responsible for the group’s systems of internal control and risk management and for reviewing the effectiveness of those systems. Such systems are designed to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives; any system can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss.

The Board also takes account of significant social, environmental and ethical matters that relate to BT’s businesses. The company’s workplace practices, specific environmental, social and ethical risks and opportunities and details of underlying governance processes are dealt with in the Our people and Our commitment to society sections of this report.

BT has processes for identifying, evaluating and managing the significant risks faced by the group. These processes have been in place for the whole of the 2003 financial year and have continued up to the date on which this document was approved. The processes are in accordance with the guidance for directors published in the UK in September 1999.

Risk assessment and evaluation takes place as an integral part of the group’s annual strategic planning cycle. The group has a detailed risk management process which identifies the key risks facing the group and each business unit. This information is reviewed by senior management as part of the strategic review. The group’s current key risks are summarised in Risk factors of this document.

The key features of the risk management process comprise the following procedures:

  • senior executives, led by the group’s Risk Manager, review the group’s key risks and have created a group risk register. This is reviewed by the Management Council before being approved by the Board.
  • the lines of business carry out risk assessments of their operations, have created registers relating to those risks, and ensure that the key risks are addressed. Line of business audit committees monitor the standards of internal controls in the lines of business.
  • senior management report regularly to the Group Finance Director on the operation of internal controls in their area of responsibility.
  • the Chief Executive receives annual reports from senior executives with responsibilities for major group operations with their opinion on the effectiveness of the operation of internal controls during the financial year.
  • the group’s internal auditors carry out continuing assessments of the quality of risk management and control. They also promote effective risk management in the lines of business operations.
  • the Audit Committee, on behalf of the Board, considers the effectiveness of the operation of internal control procedures in the group during the financial year. This follows consideration of the matter by the Management Council. The Audit Committee reviews reports from the internal auditors and from the external auditors and reports its conclusions to the Board. The Audit Committee has carried out these actions for the 2003 financial year.

Material joint ventures and associates, which BT does not control, outside the UK have not been dealt with as part of the group for the purposes of this internal control assessment.

Relations with shareholders
Senior executives, led by the Chief Executive and the Group Finance Director, hold meetings with the company’s principal institutional shareholders to discuss the company’s strategy, financial performance and specific major investment activities. As explained in the Report on directors’ remuneration, we also maintain contact, when appropriate, through the chairman of the Remuneration Committee and other senior executives to discuss overall remuneration policies and plans. Contact with institutional shareholders (and with financial analysts, brokers and the media) is controlled by written guidelines to ensure the protection of share price sensitive information that has not already been made generally available to the company’s shareholders.

We are continuing our policy that shareholders vote on the annual report at the AGM. Shareholders will also be asked this year to vote on the Report on directors’ remuneration as required by the Directors’ Remuneration Report Regulations 2002, having been asked to vote on the company’s remuneration policy at previous AGMs.

It is part of our policy to involve shareholders fully in the affairs of the company and to give them the opportunity at the AGM to ask questions about the company’s activities and prospects. We also give the shareholders the opportunity to vote on every substantially different issue by proposing a separate resolution for each issue. The Board’s opinion is that the re-election and the fees of the auditors are inter-related matters and should therefore be dealt with in one resolution.

The proxy votes for and against each resolution, as well as abstentions, will be counted before the AGM and the results will be made available at the meeting after the shareholders have voted on each resolution on a show of hands.

It is our policy for all directors to attend the AGM if at all possible. Whilst, because of ill health or other pressing reasons, this may not always be possible, in normal circumstances this means that the chairman of the Audit and Remuneration Committees is at the AGM and is available to answer relevant questions.

The Annual Review and, if requested, the Annual Report and Form 20-F, together with the Notice of the AGM, are sent to shareholders in the most cost-effective fashion, given the large number of shareholders. We aim to give as much notice as possible and at least 21 clear days, as required by the company’s articles of association. In practice, these documents are being sent to shareholders more than 20 working days before the AGM.

Established procedures ensure the timely release of share price sensitive information and the publication of the company’s financial results and regulatory financial statements.

Non audit services provided by the external auditors
As a result of regulatory or similar requirements, it is necessary to employ the company’s external auditors for certain non-audit work. In order to maintain the independence of the external auditors, the Board has determined policies as to what non-audit services can be provided by the company’s external auditors and the approval processes related to them. Under those policies work of a consultancy nature will not be offered to the external auditors unless there are clear efficiencies and value added benefits to the company. The Audit Committee monitors the level of non-audit fees paid to the external auditors.

Statement of business practice
To reinforce our commitment to achieve best practice in our standards of business integrity, BT has a written statement of business practice (The Way We Work). The statement covers all our operations and reflects the expectations in the area of corporate governance and business practice standards. A copy of the statement has been sent to every employee and is also available on the company’s intranet site.

These high-level principles are supported by a comprehensive communications programme and online training. A confidential helpline and e-mail facility are also available to employees who have questions about the application of these principles. We also continue to require our agents and contractors to apply these principles when representing BT.

Political donations
It has always been BT’s policy that no company in the group shall make cash contributions to any political party. This policy continues. However, the Companies Act 1985 requires companies to obtain shareholder authority before they can make donations to EU political organisations (which includes UK political parties). The definition of political donations used in the Act is very much broader than the ordinary sense in which these words are used. As a result, it covers activities which form part of normal relationships between BT and the political machinery. These activities are not designed to support any political party or to influence public support for a particular party and would not be thought of as political donations in the everyday sense of these words. They are entirely non-political in nature and are designed so that BT can make MPs and others aware of key industry issues and matters affecting the company.

The authority we are requesting from shareholders at the AGM is not designed to change the company’s stated policy of not making cash contributions. It will, however, ensure that BT acts within the provisions of the current UK law when carrying out the above activities. They are carried out on an even-handed basis related broadly to the major UK political parties’ electoral strength and the company believes that they make an important contribution to the success of BT.

Pension funds
BT’s two main pension funds – the BT Pension Scheme and the BT Retirement Plan – are not controlled by the Board but by separate trustees who are company and union nominees, under independent chairmen. The trustees look after the assets of the funds, which are held separately from those of the company. The pension schemes’ funds can only be used in accordance with their respective rules and for no other purpose.

A statement by the directors of their responsibilities for preparing the financial statements is included in the Statement of directors’ responsibility.

US Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
BT has securities registered with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As a result, BT is obliged to comply with those provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the ‘‘Act’’) applicable to foreign issuers. BT will comply with the legal and regulatory requirements introduced pursuant to this new legislation, in so far as they are applicable to the group.

In accordance with the recommendations issued by the SEC, BT has established a Disclosure Committee comprising appropriate senior executives which reports to the Chief Executive and Group Finance Director.

The Chief Executive and Group Finance Director after evaluating the effectiveness of BT’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the date of the group’s Annual Report and Form 20-F, have concluded that, at that date, BT’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to BT was made known to them by others within the BT group particularly during the period in which the Annual Report and Form 20-F was being prepared. The Chief Executive and Group Finance Director have also provided the certifications required by the Act.

There were no significant changes in BT’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date the Chief Executive and Group Finance Director completed their evaluation, nor were there any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in BT’s internal controls requiring corrective actions.

back to top

BT Group plc 2003       Privacy policy